Rare Book Monthly

Articles - June - 2021 Issue

Curious George and the Cancel Culture

Curious George – a symbol of American racism or a curious little monkey?

Curious George – a symbol of American racism or a curious little monkey?

Unwittingly of late, books have found themselves thrown into the controversy of so-called “cancel culture.” This is where things once generally accepted have been suppressed because they no longer meet today's standards of decency and respect for one another. We no longer permit the existence of that once “peculiar institution” of slavery, nor the publication of child pornography for obvious reasons. They have been “cancelled.” Good.

 

Somewhere between black slavery and published child pornography is racist literature. Like child pornography, it is hideous and can lead to emotional and physical harm to its victims. In this case, the victims are the heirs to slavery rather than children. Still, for the most part, where not leading to immediate physical harm, we permit racist literature to exist. The obvious reason is that we also cherish free speech and are reluctant to infringe on it because none of us wants to live in North Korea or places that “protect” us from hearing what the leadership does not want us to hear.

 

However, the expression “cancel culture” is not being tossed around to describe the most egregious of violations of human decency, such as child pornography, Nazi literature, and other comparably ugly racist screeds. It now is usually associated with alleged violations of decency that are small, and to many, appear imaginary. The most notable example is that of Dr. Seuss. Seuss combines the affection for one of the most popular children's authors ever with a few mildly “racist” drawings typical of his time. Theodor Geisel, the man who wrote and illustrated under the name “Dr. Seuss,” was a tolerant and caring man, but like Washington and Lincoln, he lived in different times. Few would have recognized certain stereotypes as racist or harmful in the 1930s and 1940s as we do today. Seuss' earliest works (before he began writing children's books) were the most objectionable. He evolved, as do all people of good will, over time.

 

When it comes to Seuss, the violations were not egregious. Most often cited is his And to Think that I Saw it on Mulberry Street, where an apparently Chinese man is shown carrying a rice bowl and chopsticks while wearing a conical hat. Certainly, that would be seen as a crude stereotype today, but few would have realized it in 1937. Most Americans undoubtedly thought it accurately portrayed how most Chinese people lived, such was our ignorance of foreign cultures.

 

As a result, the trust holding the rights to Dr. Seuss' copyrights decided to no longer publish this book and five others. Some believe he is being “cancelled,” though it should be noted that no one “cancelled” Seuss' books. The owner decided it no longer wished to publish these books, as is their right. No one forced them to stop. But, should they have stopped? My own opinion is no, they should not have. What they should have done was excise the occasional image inappropriate by current standards and then continued to publish. There is not so much offensive in Seuss' books as to make them unredeemable. Just remove an occasional image or word no longer appropriate. I have no doubt this is what Geisel would have wished.

 

It now appears some other books have joined the Seuss lexicon of those to whom some people object on similar grounds. Joining Seuss for a few people now is Curious George. He is the curious and mischievous little monkey who has been entertaining children since 1941. What sort of trouble has George got into now? In trying to understand this issue I came across an essay entitled A Good Little Monkey: Curious George’s Undercurrent of White Dominance and the Series’ Continued Popularity, on the Boston University Arts & Sciences Writing Program website.

 

The basis for the complaints about George appear to be his origin in Africa and his capture and removal to the West. The writer explains “...the Man’s ultimate goal consists of robbing George of his freedom and placing him in captivity, an objective that encapsulates the intentions of slave traders.” The writer continues, “... the traditional association of apes and monkeys with Blacks in comics and political cartoons throughout the twentieth century materializes with the Reys’ choice of George as a monkey, reaffirming his bestiality and his inferiority that results from being less than human. In ignoring the dehumanizing nature of the slave trade and slavery itself and instead celebrating their prevalent existence in American history by employing stereotypes and negative racial depictions, the book proves disturbingly problematic, especially given its wide-reception and popularity nearly seventy-five years later.”

 

Why did this writer conclude that George represents a Black person? Because he is a monkey? There is nothing in the book to suggest such an odious comparison. Was the Reys' intention in using a monkey to ignore “the dehumanizing nature of the slave trade and slavery itself and instead celebrating their prevalent existence in American history.” The Reys were German Jews who wrote this book shortly before escaping Nazi persecution. They certainly understood racial intolerance all too well, though probably not that much about American history. Why would anyone think their purpose was to dehumanize slaves, or that they wished to celebrate American slavery? The writer concedes she had never seen anything wrong with the book when reading it as a child nor had those who encouraged her to read it. So why has she now concluded that a monkey must symbolize a Black person? Taking George from his African home was probably wrong, and taking real monkeys and other animals from their African homes to zoos probably is too, but that is a wrong to the animals, not an act of racism. Who has ever looked at a zebra in a zoo and seen it as a symbol of slaves shipped off on the Middle Passage to America? Are our own preconceived stereotypes leading us to read more into some harmless fantasy than is there?

 

Now you must assume I am one of those who targets the “cancel culture” for some ulterior motives. I am not. My values are far more like those of the writer than she would probably imagine. I am aware that racism still runs deep in much of American society. After years of very slow progress, the last few years have seen some major steps back. I have no idea why we cannot shake this “original sin” of our society, but for some incomprehensible reason it persists. It is immoral and unacceptable, and yet we accept it. Don't ask me why. I will leave that to the psychologists and sociologists to explain.

 

What I do fear is when we take the essentially harmless books that at most need a little editing, but are beloved parts of our childhood and culture, and label them as racist screeds, we trivialize the real plague that is racism. It is similar to accusing anyone who does something wrong of being a Nazi. George Floyd is the real face of racism, not Curious George. We cannot be misled into thinking that is all there is to racism. It is not. It is cruel, brutal, and immoral. We need to cancel racism, not Dr. Seuss and Curious George.

 


Posted On: 2021-06-01 19:45
User Name: psps

I totally, completely agree - except for one small point, which I will come to in a moment. I am British and live in France. This whole cancel culture disaster is, I'm afraid, typically American. You - not you, Bill, but Americans as a nation - refuse to confront the deep, embedded racism in your country, and instead, as an alibi to make you feel good, focus on secondary, trivial issues: statues, old books. It is monumental hypocrisy. If you destroy - cancel - the past, how can you learn from it? Dr Seuss, Curious George, and all the rest need to be preserved as they are. (And this is where I disagree - nothing should be excised - because people today need to understand how earlier generations thought and behaved). Racism needs to be extirpated by facing up to it in all its ugliness and cruelty today - not by feelgood actions, censoring books from long ago. What is worst is that these mad ideas of yours - like cancel culture - then infect the rest of the world.


Posted On: 2021-06-03 02:54
User Name: mairin

A good piece, Michael, sensitively handled, and you hit all the right marks, for sure. I recall buying Curious George books for my youngest brother, Francis Xavier (a 7th son, so a special young fellow). That brother recently bought some Curious George books for his first grandson. So this was material which resonated with me. Thanks for selecting this subject. - Maureen E. Mulvihill, Collector.


Posted On: 2021-06-04 17:39
User Name: kenpa

I was raised in a Scandinavian area of the Pacific North West and had no inkling of racism before I got older and began traveling.I firmly believe that psps's piece is right on the money. Deal with today's problems today. 'Book Burning' is hardly the answer. I do not believe in censorship but I do strongly believe in social education. There is an excellent discussion of this in part of Norman's new book "Immune Thinking". https://www.youtube.com/watch?utm_source=Ticket+Reminders+%26+Links+from+Pittsburgh+Arts+%26+Lectures&utm_campaign=dd2afd8792-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_06_03_01_06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d591e86ae5-dd2afd8792-474956863&v=roqJQ7g_2vw&feature=youtu.be
KP


Rare Book Monthly

  • Forum Auctions
    Fine Books, Manuscripts and Works on Paper
    27th March 2025
    Forum, Mar. 27: Dürer (Albrecht) Hierin sind begriffen vier bücher von menschlicher Proportion, 4 parts in 1, first edition, Nuremberg, Hieronymus Andreae for Agnes Dürer, 1528. £30,000 to £40,000.
    Forum, Mar. 27: Book of Hours, Use of Rome, illuminated manuscript in Latin, on vellum, 26 fine hand-painted miniatures, 17th century dark brown morocco, [Lyon], [c. 1475 and later c. 1490-1500]. £25,000 to £35,000.
    Forum, Mar. 27: Brontë (Emily) The North Wind, watercolour, [1842]. £15,000 to £20,000.
    Forum, Mar. 27: Titanic.- Mudd (Thomas Cupper, one of the youngest victims of the sinking of the Titanic, 1895-1912) Autograph Letter signed on board RMS Titanic to his mother, April 11th 1912. £20,000 to £30,000.
    Forum Auctions
    Fine Books, Manuscripts and Works on Paper
    27th March 2025
    Forum, Mar. 27: [Austen (Jane)] Emma: A Novel, 3 vol., first edition, for John Murray, 1816. £10,000 to £15,000.
    Forum, Mar. 27: Picasso (Pablo).- Ovid. Les Metamorphoses, one of 95 copies, signed by the artist, Lausanne, Albert Skira, 1931. £10,000 to £15,000.
    Forum, Mar. 27: America.- Ogilby (John) America: Being the Latest, and Most Accurate Description of the New World..., all maps with vibrant hand-colouring in outline, probably by an early hand, 1671. £15,000 to £25,000.
    Forum, Mar. 27: Iceland.- Geological exploration.- Bright (Dr. Richard )and Edward Bird. Collection of twenty original drawings from travels in Iceland with Henry Holland and George Mackenzie, watercolours, [1810]. £20,000 to £30,000.
  • Forum Auctions
    The Library of Barry Humphries
    26th March 2025
    Forum, Mar. 26: Beckford (William) [Vathek] An Arabian Tale, first (but unauthorised) edition, Lady Caroline Lamb's copy with her signature and notes, 1786. £2,000 to £3,000.
    Forum, Mar. 26: Baudelaire (Charles) Les Fleurs du Mal, first edition containing the 6 suppressed poems, first issue, contemporary half black morocco, Paris, 1857. £4,000 to £6,000.
    Forum, Mar. 26: Beardsley (Aubrey).- Pope (Alexander) The Rape of the Lock, one of 25 copies on Japanese vellum, Leonard Smithers, 1896. £4,000 to £6,000.
    Forum, Mar. 26: Douglas (Lord Alfred) Sonnets, first edition, the dedication copy, with signed presentation inscription from the author to his wife Olive Custance, The Academy, 1909. £2,000 to £3,000.
    Forum Auctions
    The Library of Barry Humphries
    26th March 2025
    Forum, Mar. 26: Crowley (Aleister) The Works..., 3 vol. in 1 (as issued)"Essay Competition" issue on India paper, signed presentation inscription from the author, 1905-07. £1,500 to £2,000.
    Forum, Mar. 26: Rodin (Auguste).- Mirbeau (Octave) Le Jardin des Supplices, one of 30 copies on chine with an additional suite, bound in dark purple goatskin, Paris, 1902. £3,000 to £4,000.
    Forum, Mar. 26: Pellar (Hans) Eight original book illustrations for 'Der verliebte Flamingo' [together with] a published copy of the first edition of the book, 1923. £6,000 to £8,000.
    Forum, Mar. 26: Cretté (Georges, binder).- Louÿs (Pierre) Les Aventures du Roi Pausole, 2 vol., one of 99 copies, with 2 original drawings, superbly bound in blue goatskin, gilt, Paris, 1930. £3,000 to £4,000.
  • Sotheby's
    Sell Your Fine Books & Manuscripts
    Sotheby’s: The Shem Tov Bible, 1312 | A Masterpiece from the Golden Age of Spain. Sold: 6,960,000 USD
    Sotheby’s: Ten Commandments Tablet, 300-800 CE | One of humanity's earliest and most enduring moral codes. Sold: 5,040,000 USD
    Sotheby’s: William Blake | Songs of Innocence and of Experience. Sold: 4,320,000 USD
    Sotheby’s: The Declaration of Independence | The Holt printing, the only copy in private hands. Sold: 3,360,000 USD
    Sotheby's
    Sell Your Fine Books & Manuscripts
    Sotheby’s: Thomas Taylor | The original cover art for Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. Sold: 1,920,000 USD
    Sotheby’s: Machiavelli | Il Principe, a previously unrecorded copy of the book where modern political thought began. Sold: 576,000 GBP
    Sotheby’s: Leonardo da Vinci | Trattato della pittura, ca. 1639, a very fine pre-publication manuscript. Sold: 381,000 GBP
    Sotheby’s: Henri Matisse | Jazz, Paris 1947, the complete portfolio. Sold: 312,000 EUR
  • Swann
    Printed & Manuscript African Americana
    March 20, 2025
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 7: Thomas Fisher, The Negro's Memorial or Abolitionist's Catechism, London, 1825. $6,000 to $9,000.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 78: Victor H. Green, The Negro Travelers' Green Book, New York, 1958. $20,000 to $30,000.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 99: Rosa Parks, Hand-written recollection of her first meeting with Martin Luther King Jr., autograph manuscript, Detroit, c. 1990s. $30,000 to $40,000.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 154: Frederick Douglass, Autograph statement on voting rights, signed manuscript, 1866. $20,000 to $30,000.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 164: W.E.B. Du Bois, What the Negro Has Done for the United States and Texas, Washington, circa 1936. $3,000 to $4,000.
    Swann
    Printed & Manuscript African Americana
    March 20, 2025
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 263: Susan Paul, Memoir of James Jackson, Boston, 1835. $6,000 to $9,000.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 267: Langston Hughes, Gypsy Ballads, signed translation of García Lorca's poetry, Madrid, 1937. $1,500 to $2,500.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 274: Malcolm X, Collection from Alex Haley's estate, 38 items, 1963-1971. $4,000 to $6,000.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 367: Solomon Northup, Twelve Years a Slave, Auburn, NY, 1853. $2,500 to $3,500.
    Swann, Mar. 20: Lot 402: Anna Julia Cooper, A Voice from the South, Xenia, OH, 1892. $2,000 to $3,000.
  • Koller, Mar. 26: Wit, Frederick de. Atlas. Amsterdam, de Wit, [1680]. CHF 20,000 to 30,000
    Koller, Mar. 26: Merian, Maria Sibylla. Der Raupen wunderbare Verwandelung, und sonderbare Blumennahrung. Nürnberg, 1679; Frankfurt a. M. und Leipzig, 1683. CHF 20,000 to 30,000
    Koller, Mar. 26: GOETHE, JOHANN WOLFGANG VON. Faust. Ein Fragment. Von Goethe. Ächte Ausgabe. Leipzig, G. J. Göschen, 1790. CHF 7,000 to 10,000
    Koller, Mar. 26: Hieronymus. [Das hochwirdig leben der außerwoelten freünde gotes der heiligen altuaeter]. Augsburg, Johann Schönsperger d. Ä., 9. Juni 1497. CHF 40,000 to 60,000.
    Koller, Mar. 26: BIBLIA GERMANICA - Neunte deutsche Bibel. Nürnberg, A. Koberger, 17. Feb. 1483. CHF 40,000 to 60,000
    Koller, Mar. 26: HORAE B.M.V. - Stundenbuch. Lateinische Handschrift auf Pergament, Kalendarium französisch. Nordfrankreich (Rouen?). CHF 25,000 to 40,000

Article Search

Archived Articles

Ask Questions